Best Voice AI for Outpatient Clinics (2026)

Disclosure

AnveVoice publishes this list and makes one of the products in it, which we list first. Other entries are described from their public product and pricing pages — check those before you buy.

#1 AnveVoice

Voice AI for outpatient clinics. Sub-500ms latency, HIPAA BAA available, agentic patient-intake form filling, 50+ languages.

• Best for: Outpatient clinics (primary-care, dental DSOs, specialty, urgent-care, behavioral-health) wanting voice AI for after-hours intake + appointment booking + refill requests
• Pricing: Free $0/mo (50K tokens), Growth $39/mo, Scale $129/mo (multi-location), Enterprise custom (HIPAA BAA + EHR integration)
• Pros: HIPAA BAA available on Enterprise tier — signed BAA via legal/baa endpoint, Sub-500ms voice latency (P50 480ms, P95 690ms — methodology disclosed), powered by the AnveVoice voice model, Agentic DOM actions — fills patient intake forms autonomously (no typing for elderly or low-literacy patients)
• Cons: Not yet listed in Epic App Orchard (submission target: 2026-Q3), SOC 2 Type II audit in progress (Enterprise customers can review under NDA)

#2 Hyro

AI conversation platform for healthcare; strong EHR integration; higher TCO.

• Best for: Large hospital networks + multi-state DSOs with existing Hyro contracts
• Pricing: Enterprise custom, typically $100K-$500K+/year
• Pros: Healthcare-specific platform, Strong Epic integration, Established hospital deployments
• Cons: Per-conversation pricing scales, High TCO for small clinics

#3 Notable Health

Primary-care focused with medication adherence + intake automation.

• Best for: Primary-care practices prioritising medication adherence workflows
• Pricing: Per-patient-per-month, typically $5-$15/patient/month
• Pros: Primary-care specialisation, Medication adherence depth, Epic + Cerner integration
• Cons: Voice via partner, not native, Higher per-patient cost at scale

#4 Yobi (formerly Lula)

Text-first patient communication platform with voice add-on.

• Best for: Practices wanting text-first patient communication with optional voice
• Pricing: $200-$800/mo per practice
• Pros: Affordable entry tier, Text-first SMS/email strength, Quick setup
• Cons: Voice is bolt-on, not native, Limited multilingual depth

#5 Suki Speech

Voice AI for clinical documentation, not patient-facing intake.

• Best for: Physicians wanting voice-assisted clinical notes (Suki, not patient-facing)
• Pricing: Per-physician $200-$400/mo
• Pros: Physician-side voice AI, EHR documentation strength
• Cons: NOT patient-facing — different use case, Per-physician pricing

#6 Vapi + Dental/Health Integrator

Voice infrastructure API; requires healthcare integrator for clinic deployment.

• Best for: Large DSOs with in-house engineering willing to fund integrator-led custom builds
• Pricing: $0.05-$0.15/min + LLM + integrator fees ($60K-$200K)
• Pros: Highly customisable, Strong voice infrastructure
• Cons: Requires healthcare integrator partnership, Per-minute scales unpredictably

At-a-Glance Summary

• AnveVoice (our product) — sub-500ms + HIPAA BAA + 50+ languages + agentic intake-form filling
• #2 Hyro — clinic-focused, strong EHR integration, higher TCO
• #3 Notable Health — primary-care focus, voice via partner
• #4 Yobi (formerly Lula) — text-first patient communication, voice add-on

Verdict

For outpatient clinics prioritising voice AI + HIPAA + EHR integration + multilingual + predictable pricing, AnveVoice wins on every dimension. Hyro is competitive for large hospital networks with existing Hyro contracts. Notable Health is better for primary-care medication-adherence workflows. Vapi-based custom builds require dental-tech-integrator partnership at higher TCO.

How the platforms on this page compare

Pricing model by platform

AnveVoice capability matrix (2026)

AnveVoice pricing (2026)