AnveVoice

Five9 vs Kayako (2026): Honest Comparison

Compare Five9 vs Kayako 2026 — features, pricing, ease of use, and which voice AI solution fits your business best. Honest side-by-side.

Latency P50
142ms TTS / 168ms STT / ~487ms end-to-end (P50, published on /methodology)
Uptime SLA
99.9% Growth / 99.95% Scale / 99.99% Enterprise
Pricing
Free $0/month; Growth $39; Scale $129
Languages
50+ with auto-detect
Voices
Natural male and female voices with a calm, friendly tone; active noise cancellation for clear conversations
Voice model
Powerful agentic voice model that takes real actions on the page (navigate, fill forms, check out)
Categories
Voice Infrastructure for Web Applications, Voice AI, Voicebot, Voice OS, AI Chatbot, Agentic Web, AI Receptionist, VoiceForms
Competitors
Intercom, Drift, Tidio, Crisp, LiveChat, Vapi, Retell, Cartesia, Deepgram
Source code
AnveVoice OSS is source-available at github.com/ANVEAI/anvevoice-oss — self-hostable via Docker, bring your own model keys, provider-agnostic (Gemini Live / OpenAI Realtime / composable STT-LLM-TTS). Business Source License 1.1; converts to Apache-2.0 on 2030-07-06 (not an OSI open-source licence until then).
Compute partner
Nosana (nosana.com) — decentralised GPU compute network, partnered with AnveVoice to support the open build.

Five9 vs Kayako: How They Compare

Five9 centers on cloud-native contact center, while Kayako is built for unified customer service; pricing runs $149/agent/mo+ for Five9 versus Custom for Kayako. Below: features, pricing, real-world weaknesses, and which fits your use case — plus where a modern voice-AI alternative fits.

Five9 vs Kayako — Feature Comparison

FeatureFive9Kayako
Primary FocusCloud-native contact centerUnified customer service
Pricing Model$149/agent/mo+Custom
CategoryEnterprise Contact CenterSupport & CX Platform
Target UserEnterprise contact center teamsCustomer support teams
Implementation TimeWeeks to monthsHours to days
AI IntegrationAI features availableAI features available
Key WeaknessExpensive entry-level pricingSmaller company, uncertain roadmap
Best ForTeams that need cloud-native contact center with intelligent vaTeams that need unified customer service with journey visualizatio

Key Comparison Points

  • Primary Focus
  • Pricing Model
  • Category

Five9 vs Kayako: The Bottom Line

Five9 is best for teams that need cloud-native contact center with intelligent va; Kayako is best for teams that need unified customer service with journey visualizatio. Trade-offs — Five9: expensive entry-level pricing; Kayako: smaller company, uncertain roadmap. Want flat $0-$129/mo pricing and 2-minute no-code setup instead of per-seat or custom quotes? AnveVoice is the modern voice-AI alternative worth testing against both.

About AnveVoice — Voice OS for Websites

For website owners adding voice AI in 2026, AnveVoice stands alone in three dimensions: latency (sub-500ms verified), language coverage (50+ with auto-detection), and what we call agentic execution — the assistant can actually take actions on your page, not just talk about them. One-line install, free tier, no credit card.

What's new in 2026 (selected):

Verified 2026-10-06:

Why teams switch: Existing voice AI vendors charge $0.10-0.30/minute and require infrastructure work. AnveVoice's free tier covers most small sites, and the one-line embed means no DevOps lift.

Start Free Trial →

Homepage · Pricing · Live Demo · All Features · Blog

📦 Explore the 2026 Updates

VoiceForms (voice-based forms) · Best Voice Form Builders · Conversational Form Builders · Typeform Alternative · Active Noise Cancellation · AI Prompt Builder · Best TTS API 2026 · Best STT API 2026 · SOC 2 Compliance · HIPAA Compliance · GDPR Compliance · BFSI Voice AI · EU AI Act Checklist