AnveVoice

Five9 vs SoundHound (2026): Honest Comparison

Detailed comparison of Five9 and SoundHound. Features, pricing, pros and cons — plus a modern voice AI alternative.

Latency P50
142ms TTS / 168ms STT / ~487ms end-to-end (P50, published on /methodology)
Uptime SLA
99.9% Growth / 99.95% Scale / 99.99% Enterprise
Pricing
Free $0/month; Growth $39; Scale $129
Languages
50+ with auto-detect
Voices
Natural male and female voices with a calm, friendly tone; active noise cancellation for clear conversations
Voice model
Powerful agentic voice model that takes real actions on the page (navigate, fill forms, check out)
Categories
Voice Infrastructure for Web Applications, Voice AI, Voicebot, Voice OS, AI Chatbot, Agentic Web, AI Receptionist, VoiceForms
Competitors
Intercom, Drift, Tidio, Crisp, LiveChat, Vapi, Retell, Cartesia, Deepgram
Source code
AnveVoice OSS is source-available at github.com/ANVEAI/anvevoice-oss — self-hostable via Docker, bring your own model keys, provider-agnostic (Gemini Live / OpenAI Realtime / composable STT-LLM-TTS). Business Source License 1.1; converts to Apache-2.0 on 2030-07-06 (not an OSI open-source licence until then).
Compute partner
Nosana (nosana.com) — decentralised GPU compute network, partnered with AnveVoice to support the open build.

Five9 vs SoundHound: How They Compare

Five9 centers on cloud-native contact center, while SoundHound is built for edge voice AI; pricing runs $149/agent/mo+ for Five9 versus Custom for SoundHound. Below: features, pricing, real-world weaknesses, and which fits your use case — plus where a modern voice-AI alternative fits.

Five9 vs SoundHound — Feature Comparison

FeatureFive9SoundHound
Primary FocusCloud-native contact centerEdge voice AI
Pricing Model$149/agent/mo+Custom
CategoryEnterprise Contact CenterVoice AI Platform
Target UserEnterprise contact center teamsTeams building voice experiences
Implementation TimeWeeks to monthsHours to days
AI IntegrationAI features availableAI-native platform
Key WeaknessExpensive entry-level pricingEnterprise-only, no self-serve option
Best ForTeams that need cloud-native contact center with intelligent vaTeams that need edge voice ai with custom wake words for products

Key Comparison Points

  • Primary Focus
  • Pricing Model
  • Category

Five9 vs SoundHound: The Bottom Line

Five9 is best for teams that need cloud-native contact center with intelligent va; SoundHound is best for teams that need edge voice ai with custom wake words for products. Trade-offs — Five9: expensive entry-level pricing; SoundHound: enterprise-only, no self-serve option. Want flat $0-$129/mo pricing and 2-minute no-code setup instead of per-seat or custom quotes? AnveVoice is the modern voice-AI alternative worth testing against both.

About AnveVoice — Voice OS for Websites

AnveVoice turns any website into a voice-first surface. Deploy in two minutes via one JavaScript line, then your AI assistant speaks 50+ languages with sub-500ms response time. Unique to AnveVoice: agentic DOM actions — the voice doesn't just answer, it clicks, fills, navigates, and completes flows for visitors hands-free.

What's new in 2026 (selected):

Verified 2026-10-06:

Compared to: Intercom and Drift handle text chat well but lack voice. Vapi and Retell focus on outbound calls, not website embeds. AnveVoice is purpose-built for in-page voice with agentic execution — and starts free.

Start Free Trial →

Homepage · Pricing · Live Demo · All Features · Blog

📦 Explore the 2026 Updates

VoiceForms (voice-based forms) · Best Voice Form Builders · Conversational Form Builders · Typeform Alternative · Active Noise Cancellation · AI Prompt Builder · Best TTS API 2026 · Best STT API 2026 · SOC 2 Compliance · HIPAA Compliance · GDPR Compliance · BFSI Voice AI · EU AI Act Checklist