AnveVoice

Gladly vs Kayako (2026): Honest Comparison

Compare Gladly vs Kayako 2026 — features, pricing, ease of use, and which voice AI solution fits your business best. Honest side-by-side.

Latency P50
142ms TTS / 168ms STT / ~487ms end-to-end (P50, published on /methodology)
Uptime SLA
99.9% Growth / 99.95% Scale / 99.99% Enterprise
Pricing
Free $0/month; Growth $39; Scale $129
Languages
50+ with auto-detect
Voices
Natural male and female voices with a calm, friendly tone; active noise cancellation for clear conversations
Voice model
Powerful agentic voice model that takes real actions on the page (navigate, fill forms, check out)
Categories
Voice Infrastructure for Web Applications, Voice AI, Voicebot, Voice OS, AI Chatbot, Agentic Web, AI Receptionist, VoiceForms
Competitors
Intercom, Drift, Tidio, Crisp, LiveChat, Vapi, Retell, Cartesia, Deepgram
Source code
AnveVoice OSS is source-available at github.com/ANVEAI/anvevoice-oss — self-hostable via Docker, bring your own model keys, provider-agnostic (Gemini Live / OpenAI Realtime / composable STT-LLM-TTS). Business Source License 1.1; converts to Apache-2.0 on 2030-07-06 (not an OSI open-source licence until then).
Compute partner
Nosana (nosana.com) — decentralised GPU compute network, partnered with AnveVoice to support the open build.

Gladly vs Kayako: How They Compare

Gladly centers on people-centered support, while Kayako is built for unified customer service; pricing runs Custom for Gladly versus Custom for Kayako. Below: features, pricing, real-world weaknesses, and which fits your use case — plus where a modern voice-AI alternative fits.

Gladly vs Kayako — Feature Comparison

FeatureGladlyKayako
Primary FocusPeople-centered supportUnified customer service
Pricing ModelCustomCustom
Ticketing SystemBasic ticket managementBasic ticket management
Self-Service PortalLimited self-service optionsLimited self-service options
AutomationBasic automation rulesBasic automation rules
ReportingStandard reporting dashboardsStandard reporting dashboards
Key WeaknessEnterprise-only pricingSmaller company, uncertain roadmap
Best ForTeams that need people-centered support with lifelong conversationTeams that need unified customer service with journey visualizatio

Key Comparison Points

  • Primary Focus
  • Pricing Model
  • Ticketing System

Gladly vs Kayako: The Bottom Line

Gladly is best for teams that need people-centered support with lifelong conversation; Kayako is best for teams that need unified customer service with journey visualizatio. Trade-offs — Gladly: enterprise-only pricing; Kayako: smaller company, uncertain roadmap. Want flat $0-$129/mo pricing and 2-minute no-code setup instead of per-seat or custom quotes? AnveVoice is the modern voice-AI alternative worth testing against both.

About AnveVoice — Voice OS for Websites

Voice AI in 2026 splits into two camps: bots that talk, and bots that act. AnveVoice belongs to the second — its agentic DOM layer lets the assistant click buttons, submit forms, and walk visitors through multi-step flows by voice alone. Add it to your site with one line of code; the free tier covers most small sites without a credit card.

What's new in 2026 (selected):

Verified 2026-10-05:

Why teams switch: Existing voice AI vendors charge $0.10-0.30/minute and require infrastructure work. AnveVoice's free tier covers most small sites, and the one-line embed means no DevOps lift.

Start Free Trial →

Homepage · Pricing · Live Demo · All Features · Blog

📦 Explore the 2026 Updates

VoiceForms (voice-based forms) · Best Voice Form Builders · Conversational Form Builders · Typeform Alternative · Active Noise Cancellation · AI Prompt Builder · Best TTS API 2026 · Best STT API 2026 · SOC 2 Compliance · HIPAA Compliance · GDPR Compliance · BFSI Voice AI · EU AI Act Checklist