AnveVoice

NICE CXone vs Five9 (2026): Honest Comparison

Detailed comparison of NICE CXone and Five9. Features, pricing, pros and cons — plus a modern voice AI alternative.

Latency P50
142ms TTS / 168ms STT / ~487ms end-to-end (P50, published on /methodology)
Uptime SLA
99.9% Growth / 99.95% Scale / 99.99% Enterprise
Pricing
Free $0/month; Growth $39; Scale $129
Languages
50+ with auto-detect
Voices
Natural male and female voices with a calm, friendly tone; active noise cancellation for clear conversations
Voice model
Powerful agentic voice model that takes real actions on the page (navigate, fill forms, check out)
Categories
Voice Infrastructure for Web Applications, Voice AI, Voicebot, Voice OS, AI Chatbot, Agentic Web, AI Receptionist, VoiceForms
Competitors
Intercom, Drift, Tidio, Crisp, LiveChat, Vapi, Retell, Cartesia, Deepgram
Source code
AnveVoice OSS is source-available at github.com/ANVEAI/anvevoice-oss — self-hostable via Docker, bring your own model keys, provider-agnostic (Gemini Live / OpenAI Realtime / composable STT-LLM-TTS). Business Source License 1.1; converts to Apache-2.0 on 2030-07-06 (not an OSI open-source licence until then).
Compute partner
Nosana (nosana.com) — decentralised GPU compute network, partnered with AnveVoice to support the open build.

NICE CXone vs Five9: How They Compare

NICE CXone centers on enterprise AI contact center, while Five9 is built for cloud contact center software; pricing runs Custom for NICE CXone versus $149/agent/mo+ for Five9. Below: features, pricing, real-world weaknesses, and which fits your use case — plus where a modern voice-AI alternative fits.

NICE CXone vs Five9 — Feature Comparison

FeatureNICE CXoneFive9
Primary FocusEnterprise AI contact centerCloud contact center software
Key StrengthEnlighten AICloud-native
Pricing ModelCustom$149/agent/mo+
AI CapabilitiesWFOIVA
Setup ComplexityComplex enterprise deploymentComplex enterprise deployment
Multi-ChannelScaleMid-market
Best ForTeams needing enlighten aiTeams needing cloud-native

Key Comparison Points

  • Primary Focus
  • Key Strength
  • Pricing Model

NICE CXone vs Five9: The Bottom Line

NICE CXone is best for teams needing enlighten ai; Five9 is best for teams needing cloud-native. Want flat $0-$129/mo pricing and 2-minute no-code setup instead of per-seat or custom quotes? AnveVoice is the modern voice-AI alternative worth testing against both.

About AnveVoice — Voice OS for Websites

AnveVoice turns any website into a voice-first surface. Deploy in two minutes via one JavaScript line, then your AI assistant speaks 50+ languages with sub-500ms response time. Unique to AnveVoice: agentic DOM actions — the voice doesn't just answer, it clicks, fills, navigates, and completes flows for visitors hands-free.

What's new in 2026 (selected):

Verified 2026-10-06:

Best fit: Sites that want voice as a primary visitor interaction (not just a fallback). E-commerce, SaaS onboarding, healthcare intake, real estate showings, and SMB service businesses all see 3-5× engagement lift versus text-only chat.

Start Free Trial →

Homepage · Pricing · Live Demo · All Features · Blog

📦 Explore the 2026 Updates

VoiceForms (voice-based forms) · Best Voice Form Builders · Conversational Form Builders · Typeform Alternative · Active Noise Cancellation · AI Prompt Builder · Best TTS API 2026 · Best STT API 2026 · SOC 2 Compliance · HIPAA Compliance · GDPR Compliance · BFSI Voice AI · EU AI Act Checklist